| Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs

OFFICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROGRAMS
Home > English
Language Programs Teaching
Pragmatics > Appropriateness in Terms of Address
Appropriateness in Terms of Address
Miyuki Takenoya
Sapporo Gakuin University, Japan
Level: Intermediate to advanced, teacher preparation course, study
abroad preparation course
Time: 45 minutes
Resources: Handouts and teacher's notes (see Teacher
Resource)
Goal: To help students become aware of problems caused by an inappropriate
choice of address forms
Description of the Activity
The instructor first introduces the topic of address forms to the learners
by defining what terms of address mean and giving examples in the learners'
native language and target language. After learners learn what terms of
address are, the instructor distributes handouts describing situations
involving forms of address. The instructor invites the learners to ask
questions if the descriptions of Situations I and II are not clear.
Situation I
A professor, Jane Smith, was lecturing in a university class on psychology.
A foreign student from an Asian country started to ask a question to
the professor saying, 'Mrs. Smith, I have a question
' The professor
apparently felt upset and said 'There is no Mrs. who is teaching in
this classroom!' What was the professor telling the student?
Situation II
Laura is a college student currently looking for a summer internship
position. She found an interesting position in the internship brochure
as an assistant at a health science research center. She wrote a letter
to the head of the center applying for the position. According to the
internship brochure, the name of the head of the research center is
M. S. Hess, MD. She addressed her letter to Mr. M. S. Hess. A few days
later, she received a phone call from some in M. S. Hess's office notifying
her that she did not get the position. In addition, she was told to
be more careful the next time she addresses someone in a letter. What
did Laura do wrong?
The instructor divides the class into 3- to 4- member groups. Each group
attempts to answer the questions at the end of the situations. After 10
to 15 minutes, each group reports what they have been discussing to the
rest of the class. The instructor summarizes their opinions and leads
the class to further discussion by encouraging the learners to think of
similar troubles and episodes from their daily life having to do with
choice of address. The teacher may wish to introduce key points from the
Teacher Resource (below).
Procedure
Total time: 45-50 minutes
1. Introduction (5 minutes): Explain what the terms of address are.
Give examples.
2. Pre-group discussion (10 minutes): Read situations from the handout
together in class. Clarify difficult words to help students understand
the situations. Learners write down their ideas.
3. Group discussion (10-15 minutes): Divide the class into groups. Learners
exchange ideas.
4. Class discussion (10 minutes): Each group reports the ideas to the
class. Instructor summarizes learners' ideas. Discuss similar experiences.
5. Conclusion (10 minutes). Conclude the discussion with the key points
of the lesson (see Teacher Resource).
Rationale
Terms of address are important linguistic mechanisms by which a speaker's
attitude toward and interpretation of his or her relationship with a speaker
is reflected. Inappropriate choice of the address hinders good communication
between the speaker and the hearer.
It is generally believed by many English language learners that the American
address system is based on a choice between first or last names, preceded
by forms of address such as Mr. Mrs. Miss. or Ms. Although this perception
is accurate to some extent, it is dangerous to oversimplify the system.
It is often difficult for English learners to grasp when to choose one
form of address over another, and to understand what the criteria are
for deciding which the appropriate form to use is. It is important for
learners to be aware of the risks associated with choosing an inappropriate
choice of address.
English language teachers in EFL settings tend to underestimate the importance
of this issue, which is related to lack of exposure to real English communication.
The activities suggested are particularly useful for in teacher training
programs and study-abroad preparation courses.
Reflections and Caveats
The procedures described have students working on two situations at the
same time; however, teachers may choose to introduce and discuss each
of them separately. Student discussions can be conducted either in the
native or the target language.
Teacher Resource
Situation I
This is a situation in which the choice of Mrs. by the student was
inappropriate. Jane Smith was telling the student that she did not want
to be addressed as Mrs. Smith. It would have been more appropriate to
address her as Professor Smith or, if she holds a doctoral degree, Dr.
Smith
The American system of address is generally described as a choice between
first names and Mr./Mrs./Miss/Ms. with last names. In a university setting,
however, using these forms of address with last names is generally considered
inappropriate for professors because to do so is to place greater weight
on the person's gender and marital status than their professional status
as teachers. (Note: Increasingly on some college campuses students are
explicitly invited by instructors to address them by their first name.
However, unless this happens, it is unwise and highly inappropriate
to so address a teacher. If a student is uncertain about the appropriate
form of address, there is nothing wrong—at least in the United
States—with asking the instructor how he or she would like to
be addressed.)
Situation II
This situation actually happened to an American student. Laura made
two errors: first, she should not have addressed the head of the research
center as Mr. Hess because the position was actually held by a woman.
When Laura saw M. S. Hess, MD., she mistakenly assumed that Hess was
a man. To assume that professionals such as doctors, professors, lawyers
or directors are invariably men is highly risky in today's world in
which women increasingly are highly educated professionals. Laura's
second error was her failure to recognize that MD stands for a medical
doctor, and whatever the gender of the person being addressed, only
the honorific Dr. is appropriate.
Back to the top

|