|
|
|
Background
| Classroom Applications |
Internet Resources | Appendices
Appendices
Appendix A: Glossary (Printer-Friendly
Format)
Breed: To
produce (offspring); give birth or hatch.
Clone: A population
of identical molecules, cells, or organisms derived from a common
source. Because no genetic material is combined (as in sexual reproduction),
a clone is genetically identical to the parent.
Consent: To
indicate or express a willingness.
Culture:
Microorganisms, tissue cells, or other living matter grown in a specially
prepared nutrient medium.
Crop: Cultivated
plants or agricultural produce, such as grains, vegetables, or fruit.
Cystic fibrosis:
(Abbreviation CF) A hereditary disease that usually develops
during early childhood and mainly affects the pancreas, respiratory
system, and sweat glands. It usually results in chronic respiratory
infections and impaired pancreatic function.
Dinosaur:
Any of various extinct, often gigantic reptiles.
Donor: One
from whom blood, tissue, or an organ is taken for use in a transfusion
or transplant. (Note: can also be used as an adjective, as in embryonic
donor cells.
Embryonic:
1. Of or relating to an embryo; 2. Of an organism prior to birth or
hatching; as in in the embryonic stage.
Emphysema:
An abnormal condition of the lungs characterized by decreased respiratory
function; associated with smoking, chronic bronchitis, or old age.
Endangered:
Faced with the danger of extinction: an endangered species.
Fertilize:
Make fertile or productive 2. Introduce semen into (a female).
Fetal: Of,
relating to, characteristic of, or being a fetus: a fertilized egg.
Fission:
An asexual (non-sexual) reproductive process in which a one-cell organism
divides into two or more independently maturing cells.
Fossil: A remnant or trace of
an organism of a past geologic age, such as a skeleton or leaf imprint,
embedded and preserved in rock.
Gaur: A large
East Indian species of wild cattle. For more information: http://www.nature.ca/notebooks/english/gaur.htm
Gregor Mendel:
Founder of the science of genetics (18221884). An Austrian monk
and botanist.
Hemophilia:
A genetic blood disorder in which the blood fails to clot normally.
This disorder is hereditary and is due to a deficiency in or an abnormality
of one of the clotting factors. Hemophilia is manifested almost exclusively
in males.
Hormone:
A naturally occurring substance secreted by specialized cells that
affects the behavior of other cells.
Husbandry:
1. The act or practice of cultivating crops and breeding and raising
livestock; agriculture. 2. The application of scientific principles
to agriculture, especially to animal breeding.
Implant:
1. To put an object or a device in a person or animal via surgery.
Manipulate:
To handle and move in an examination or for therapeutic purposes:
manipulate a joint; manipulate the position of a fetus during delivery.
Mitosis:
The entire process of cell division including division of the nucleus
and the cytoplasm.
Nucleus:
A large circular structure within a living cell that contains the
cell's hereditary material and controls its metabolism, growth, and
reproduction.
Offspring:
A child; a daughter or son.
Organism:
An individual life form, such as a plant or an animal; a body made
up of organs or other parts that work together to carry out the various
processes of life.
Protein:
The principal constituent of all cells, essentially consisting of
combinations of amino acids and peptide linkages.
Reject: To
resist the introduction of (a transplanted organ or tissue); fail
to accept as part of one's own body.
Replicate:
To make an exact copy or copies of (genetic material, a cell, or an
organism).
Reproduce:
To generate offspring by sexual or asexual (non-sexual) means.
Roots: The
usually underground portion of a plant that serves as support, draws
minerals and water from the surrounding soil, and sometimes stores
food.
Surrogate:
One that takes the place of another; a substitute: a surrogate mother.
Trait: A genetically
determined characteristic or condition: a recessive trait.
Transplant:
To transfer (tissue or an organ) from one body or body part to another.
Uterus: A
hollow muscular organ located in the pelvic cavity of female mammals
in which the fertilized egg implants and develops. Also called a womb.
Via: 1. By way
of. 2. By means of.
Vital: Necessary
to the continuation of life; life-sustaining: a vital organ, vital
nutrients.
Woolly mammoth:
Hairy extinct mammoth common in colder portions of the northern hemisphere.
For more information: http://dsc.discovery.com/convergence/landofmammoth/dispatches/dispatch.html
Womb: A hollow
muscular organ located in the pelvic cavity of female mammals in which
the fertilized egg implants and develops. Also called a uterus.
Appendix B (Printer-Friendly
Format)
Sample Student Handout 1 for Word Family Exercise
Directions: Complete the chart with the missing
parts of speech for each vocabulary item. Circle each word that is
new for you, and ask your classmates or teacher for its definition.
Verb
|
Noun
|
Adjective
|
|
to clone
|
a clone
|
cloning/ cloned
|
|
to replicate
|
|
|
|
to manipulate
|
|
|
|
to test
|
|
|
| |
an implant
|
|
| |
a reproduction
|
|
| |
a rejection
|
|
| |
a preservation
|
|
Appendix C (Printer-Friendly
Format)
Story for Warm Up Activity
Very soon after the beginning of the world, God decided
he was not too pleased with his creation. He decided to destroy the
earth by making it rain and flooding everything. However, to preserve
those things that pleased him, he asked one of his faithful people,
Noah, to help him. He came to Noah and told him that the world would
be destroyed by flood. He gave Noah exact directions for building an
ark, a boat that would be large enough to hold his entire family and
two of every animal in creation. Noah set about building the ark as
God had directed. Just as he completed it, a heavy rain began to fall.
Noah loaded all the animal pairs, one male and one female of each species,
onto the ark. It rained forty days and forty nights, and the rain destroyed
everything on earth. God had instructed Noah not to leave the ark until
it was safe. To see if it was safe, Noah sent a dove out from the ark
to find dry land. When the dove returned with an olive branch, Noah
knew it was safe to leave the ark. When all the animals and members
of Noah’s family had returned to dry land, a rainbow appeared in the
sky. This was a sign that God would never again destroy the earth by
water.
Appendix D (Printer-Friendly
Format)
Handout 2 for Students in Group A
What is cloning?
Unlike sexual reproduction, which combines the genetic material
of two individuals, cloning involves creating a new organism or individual
by copying the genetic material of only one original organism. Cloning
can be done in two ways: (1) fission, a cell dividing into two cells
or (2) mitosis, the nucleus of a cell dividing with each chromosome
splitting into two.
How does cloning work?
In its most basic form, cloning involves three steps. In the first
step, scientists take cells from an individual whose characteristics
they want to copy. They place these cells, which are called donor
cells, into a liquid culture. This culture contains nutrients and
stops the cells from dividing. In the second step, an unfertilized
egg is taken from a female. Its nucleus is removed, leaving an empty
egg cell. The donor cell is then placed into the empty egg. This process
creates an embryo that is an exact copy of the donor and not the mother.
In the final step, the embryo is put into the uterus of a female of
the species and arrives into the world via the natural birth process.
What is the most famous case of cloning?
Dolly the sheep. In 1997, scientists
successfully cloned an adult mammal, the Finn Dorset sheep Dolly.
Overnight, she became the most famous animal in the world. Although
the technology used to clone Dolly was experimental at the time, it
has proven useful in the years since she first appeared. Now, scientists
are cloning cows, chickens, and pigs. They are also able to produce
clones from animal fetal cells quite easily.
Handout 2 for Students in Group B
Which organisms are the most frequently cloned today?
Plants. For centuries, people have taken roots or stems of plants in
order to make genetically identical copies. Usually this is done by
choosing the best plant (for example, the most decorative or unusual),
cutting a root or branch from it, and placing that cutting in water
or soil. The cells will then divide and double in size every six weeks
until the cutting develops roots. At this point, it is ready to be planted.
It will then grow into an exact copy of the parent plant.
Is cloning unnatural?
No, cloning already occurs in nature. In fact, the only way that
many organisms (for example, bacteria, yeast, snails, and shrimp)
can reproduce is through cloning. Mammals reproduce naturally only
through sexual reproduction. Thus, only scientists working in a laboratory
can clone a mammal. The problem with cloning, however, is that it
does not improve the genetic makeup of a species.
What is the difference between cloning and breeding?
For years, specialists in animal husbandry have been able to breed characteristics
in and out of animals, thereby creating improved animal breeds. For
example, dog breeders have been able to control the genetic makeup of
species to obtain certain physical characteristics such as eye or fur
color, size, or special abilities such as speed or herding. Breeding,
however, is different from cloning in two ways. First, it can only be
done with embryonic cells (cells that result in the production of offspring).
Second, breeding does not produce an exact replica. Breeders can calculate
the probability of obtaining a certain trait, but to actually obtain
this trait they may have to try several times. With cloning, scientists
can choose any healthy individual whose characteristics they wish to
clone and create an exact copy by using cells from that animal.
Handout 2 for Students in Group C
What is the difference between an identical twin and a clone?
Both identical twins and clones consist of the exact same genetic
material. But a clone cannot be considered an identical twin of the
donor because it does not share the same time in the womb. Twins experience
the same environmental factors before birth (such as nutrition and
exposure to stress, hormones, alcohol, and drugs), which play an enormous
role in their physical and mental development. The clone, on the other
hand, only shares genetic material with its donor and lacks the prenatal
environmental exposure of an identical twin.
Could cloning be used to produce vital organs for transplant?
Hypothetically yes. The only way to do this, however, would be
to reproduce the entire individual, including its organs. This practice
would raise ethical questions. Time is also a problem. It would take
a long time for a donor’s organs to be mature enough to be removed
from the donor and used for transplant. In addition, scientists are
unsure whether transplanted organs from cloning would be accepted
or rejected by the recipient individual.
Handout 2 for Students in Group D
Could endangered species be saved through cloning?
Possibly. At the present time, the success of this is unlikely.
It took 276 tries to clone Dolly the sheep. But if the success rate
of cloning increases, it could be a way to increase the population
of endangered species or animals that are difficult to breed.
Could extinct species be revived using cloning?
This would be more difficult. Cloning extinct animals poses two
problems. First, donor cells must be taken from living organisms.
Unless an extinct animal is found completely frozen (such as the wooly
mammoth recently discovered in the Arctic), it would be impossible
to find living cells. For example, because the fossil bones of dinosaurs
contain no living cells, a dinosaur cannot be cloned. Second, current
cloning technology requires a surrogate mother and an egg cell from
a living female of the same species. Females normally cannot give
birth to an animal from a different species. It is unlikely, for instance,
that a female elephant could donate an egg cell and give birth to
a wooly mammoth.
Handout 2 for Students in Group E
What are the benefits of cloning?
We are more certain of obtaining desired traits through cloning
than through conventional breeding. For example, cloning could benefit
crop engineering by creating foods that are more nutritious, disease
free, and plentiful. Cloning could also help in the prevention and
cure of diseases. For instance, the same laboratory that created Dolly
the sheep is now working to create eggs that contain anticancer proteins
to prevent various forms of cancer (such as fast growing forms of
skin cancer). Dolly herself was cloned to produce a sheep whose milk
had more proteins that are believed to help treat diseases such as
emphysema, hemophilia, and cystic fibrosis.
Handout 2 for Students in Group F
What are the disadvantages of cloning?
One potential disadvantage of cloning is that “breeding” humans
would become easier. While we have done this for centuries with other
large animals such as race horses, cloning humans raises moral and
ethical concerns. There is great potential for abuse if humans are
able to design their offspring. The ability to breed in or out certain
traits would raise questions of how tall or how intelligent we would
want our children to be, or what color skin and eyes we would want
them to have. These are questions that make us uncomfortable. In addition,
it would be problematic to invest so much in changing or improving
human genetic makeup because we might ignore the impact that the environment
has on an individual’s development. A further problem is that clones
could be misused, for example, as spare part tissues and organs or
as slave labor.
Appendix E (Printer-Friendly
Format)
Handout 3 for Activity 1
- What was the first adult mammal to be cloned?
- What steps do scientists follow to clone a large animal (such as
a pig or a cow)?
- Is cloning something that only scientists can do?
- What makes an identical twin different from a clone?
- What is the controversy surrounding the cloning of organisms to
produce vital organs?
- Why can cloning be used on endangered species but not on extinct
species?
- Name two benefits and two drawbacks of cloning.
Answer Key for Activity 1
- Dolly the sheep
- First, they extract a cell from a donor animal whose traits they
want to replicate. Second, they place the donor cells in a liquid
that stops cell division. Third, they take an unfertilized egg from
a female of the same species and remove its nucleus. Fourth, they
implant the donor cell into the egg cell. Finally, they implant the
newly created embryo into the uterus of a female of the species.
- No. Anyone can clone a plant by taking a cutting and placing it
in a medium that allows it to grow, such as water or soil. In addition,
many species such as bacteria reproduce themselves via cloning.
- Identical twins share the exact same pre-natal environmental conditions,
but clones do not share an environment with the donor cell.
- First, it is currently impossible to produce just an organ. The
production of a vital organ requires reproducing an entire individual.
This takes time and raises the ethical question of consent of the
cloned individual to have its organs used in this way.
- Because cloning requires a live cell. Fossil bones usually contain
no living cells unless they are preserved in ice. However, endangered
species are still alive and living cells can be taken from them.
- The benefits are: (1) it allows for exact replication of the donor’s
traits or characteristics and (2) it can help in preventing and curing
diseases through the reproduction of individuals that are free of
certain diseases or that possess certain disease-fighting or disease-resistant
proteins. The drawbacks are: (1) it opens the way for humans to “play
God” by breeding human beings as if they were animals and (2) it may
lead us to overestimate the impact that genes have on our behavior
and identity.
Appendix F (Printer-Friendly
Format)
Handout 4 for Activity 2
Uses of Cloning
- Scientists have successfully cloned five female pigs: Millie, Christa,
Alexis, Carrel, and Dotcom. These pigs were the first ever to be cloned,
thus contributing to basic scientific knowledge about cloning. Pigs
are now being cloned as organ donors. This idea may sound strange
and impossible, but pig organs (such as the heart and liver) are similar
in form and function to those of other mammals.
- Recently, the last of an endangered species of goat, the bucardo,
died in a winter storm. The carcass of the animal was frozen and preserved.
Scientists are preparing to recreate the species by cloning one of
her cells and implanting it in the uterus of a female from another
goat species.
- Teruhiko Wakayama, a 31-year-old postdoctoral student at the University
of Hawaii, decided to see if he could use the technology developed
to produce Dolly the sheep to clone mice. Not only did he succeed
but he perfected the technique so that 3 percent of his clones survived.
The cloned mice were normal and their DNA was so robust that they
themselves could be cloned and their clones could be cloned. They
produced three generations of identical mice for a total of 50 mice.
- Scientists are working on cloning hens that lay eggs that contain
antibodies against cancer. These eggs could be a natural anticancer
drug for those human beings who ate them.
- Scientists discovered an intact woolly mammoth preserved in ice.
Their excavation techniques allowed them to preserve the mammoth's
soft tissue. Several labs around the world have proposed extracting
DNA from this soft tissue to see of they can use it to clone the mammoth.
- Scientists may be able to control aging through cloning. In the
case of Dolly the sheep, her cells appeared to be the same age as
the adult female donor from which she was cloned. In other words,
she is older than her chronological age. However, in the case of six
cloned cows created through a different cloning technique, their cells
appear to be younger than the cow's actual chronological age.
Appendix G (Printer-Friendly
Format)
Handout 5 for Activity 3: The Cloning Forum
Person’s name: Ken
E-mail: tokyoken@mail.com
From: Tokyo, Japan
Opinion: I think that the cloning of Dolly is the most important
scientific breakthrough ever. Its medical benefits alone justify spending
money on the project. While there are obvious concerns about abusing
the technology of cloning, history shows that we cannot turn back.
What we need is government action to outline ethical codes for the
use of cloning.
**********************************************************************
Person’s name: Richard
E-mail: iowacityrich@stream.net
From: Iowa City, Iowa
Opinion: It is morally wrong under any circumstances to clone a human
being and we should not even consider it. What is the use of cloning
a human being? We already have a population problem in many countries.
Where would we put any more people? I’m also afraid that we aren’t
wise enough to control this technology, which allows us to play God.
**********************************************************************
Person’s name: Wendy
E-mail: funkychick@link.net
From: San Bernardino, California
Opinion: As an academic who is deeply interested in biological matters,
I want to express my opinion about the cloning of Dolly. This opens
up important opportunities in health and the environment. Wouldn’t
it be great if we could preserve all the endangered species of the
world and bring the world’s ecosystem back into balance? Isn’t this
a better use of our resources than waging wars and developing new
technologies that further pollute our environment? It’s true, however,
that we could easily misuse the power that cloning provides us. Despite
the fears that cloning could easily be abused, I believe that human
beings can and have learned from their past mistakes and that we can
make intelligent use of this new and exciting technology.
**********************************************************************
Person’s name: Kamil
E-mail: linguist@nairobiu.com
From: Nairobi, Kenya
Opinion: There has been much discussion about the fact that a clone
will provide a perfect source for donor organs. If we consider the
clone as a life like any other, however, this raises the very serious
ethical and moral dilemma of sacrificing one life to save another.
I personally believe that this is unethical from any perspective.
What it ultimately comes down to is choosing the value of the original
over the value of the copy. While this may be true for works of art,
it doesn’t apply to sentient beings.
**********************************************************************
Person’s name: Christos
E-mail: christos@athens.net
From: Athens, Greece
Opinion: Cloning of humans would create a very confusing society
with doubles and triples of everyone walking around. How would we
distinguish identity? Would clones be issued the same passports, driver’s
licenses, and identity cards? What about credit checks? How would
the original individual prove that s/he was the original and not a
copy? How would this change our understanding of individuality and
self identity?
Appendix H (Printer-Friendly
Format)
Sample Blackboard Layout of Word
Wheel for Cool Down Activity
This
site is maintained by the Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. Links
to other sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views
contained therein.
|